2004 GMC Sierra vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 133 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (167 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 919 kg more than 2010 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (488 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (228 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Sierra | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Sierra | 3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 488 Nm | 228 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2282 kg | 1363 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 60 L |