2004 GMC Sierra vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 163 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (489 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Sierra | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Sierra | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 137 HP |
Torque | 489 Nm | 198 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4250 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 65 L |