2004 GMC Sierra vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,963 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (325 HP) has 224 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 823 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Sierra | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | GMC | Volvo |
| Model | Sierra | C30 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5963 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 101 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2130 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 60 L |
