2004 GMC Sierra vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Compass. (170 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 762 kg more than 2013 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (488 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Sierra | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | GMC | Jeep |
| Model | Sierra | Compass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 170 HP |
| Torque | 488 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 97 mm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2282 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2634 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 51 L |
