2004 GMC Yukon vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 GMC Yukon is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Yukon (325 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1603 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Yukon (495 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Yukon | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | GMC | Triumph |
| Model | Yukon | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 130 HP |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2798 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2700 mm |
