2004 GMC Yukon vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 GMC Yukon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Yukon (325 HP) has 229 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (96 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1484 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Yukon (495 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (127 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Yukon | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | GMC | Renault |
Model | Yukon | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 127 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2514 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 50 L |