2004 GMC Yukon vs. 2003 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 GMC Yukon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Yukon (325 HP) has 138 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Tundra. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Yukon weights approximately 884 kg more than 2003 Toyota Tundra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Yukon (495 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Tundra. (298 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Yukon | 2003 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | GMC | Toyota |
Model | Yukon | Tundra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 298 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2604 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3270 mm |