2004 GMC Yukon vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Yukon (325 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (265 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Yukon weights approximately 754 kg more than 2010 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-150. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Yukon (495 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (339 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Yukon | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | GMC | Ford |
Model | Yukon | E-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5964 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 265 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2604 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 72 L |