2004 GMC Yukon vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2004 GMC Yukon. (295 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Yukon.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 GMC Yukon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Yukon. (448 Nm). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Yukon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 GMC Yukon | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | GMC | Audi |
Model | Yukon | RS3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 448 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |