2004 GMC Yukon vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Yukon (325 HP) has 265 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Because 2004 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Yukon (495 Nm) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 GMC Yukon | 2012 Renault Clio | |
| Make | GMC | Renault |
| Model | Yukon | Clio |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 495 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 140 L | 50 L |
