2004 Holden Combo vs. 1974 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2004 Holden Combo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Combo (87 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1974 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Combo should accelerate faster than 1974 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden Combo weights approximately 240 kg more than 1974 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1974 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Holden Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Combo (133 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: