2004 Holden Combo vs. 1983 Skoda L
To start off, 2004 Holden Combo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Combo (87 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1983 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Combo should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden Combo weights approximately 375 kg more than 1983 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Combo (133 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden Combo | 1983 Skoda L | |
| Make | Holden | Skoda |
| Model | Combo | L |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2410 mm |
