2004 Holden Combo vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 2004 Holden Combo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Megane (136 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2004 Holden Combo. (87 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Combo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden Combo weights approximately 24 kg more than 1996 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Megane (191 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Combo. (133 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden Combo | 1996 Renault Megane | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Combo | Megane |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1176 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2460 mm |