2004 Holden Combo vs. 1999 Kia Elan
To start off, 2004 Holden Combo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Kia Elan would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Kia Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Kia Elan (149 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2004 Holden Combo. (87 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Combo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden Combo weights approximately 132 kg more than 1999 Kia Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Kia Elan (186 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Combo. (133 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden Combo | 1999 Kia Elan | |
Make | Holden | Kia |
Model | Combo | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2260 mm |