2004 Holden Combo vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Holden Combo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Holden Combo would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Combo (87 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Combo should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden Combo | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | Combo | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2360 mm |
