2004 Holden Combo vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Holden Combo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Holden Combo would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2004 Holden Combo. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Combo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Combo. (133 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Combo. 2011 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2004 Holden Combo has manual transmission. 2004 Holden Combo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden Combo | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | Combo | Epica |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2700 mm |
