2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden Rodeo | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | Rodeo | XK |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2600 mm |