2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1958 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Holden Rodeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden Rodeo | 1958 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Rodeo | CJ |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2060 mm |
