2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1963 Morris Oxford
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Rodeo (93 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1963 Morris Oxford. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1963 Morris Oxford.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Morris Oxford. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden Rodeo | 1963 Morris Oxford | |
| Make | Holden | Morris |
| Model | Rodeo | Oxford |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 122 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2560 mm |
