2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1964 NSU 1000
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1964 NSU 1000. (43 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1964 NSU 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 NSU 1000. (72 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden Rodeo | 1964 NSU 1000 | |
Make | Holden | NSU |
Model | Rodeo | 1000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 72 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2260 mm |