2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1965 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1965 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden Rodeo | 1965 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | Rodeo | MK X |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2900 mm |