2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden Rodeo | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Holden | Lincoln |
| Model | Rodeo | Continental |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 3210 mm |
