2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1972 Renault 12
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 12 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1972 Renault 12. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 12.
Because 2004 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Renault 12, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Renault 12. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Renault 12.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden Rodeo | 1972 Renault 12 | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Rodeo | 12 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2440 mm |