2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1976 Rover 2000
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Rover 2000 (142 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Rover 2000 (272 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1976 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden Rodeo | 1976 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | Rodeo | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 272 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2640 mm |