2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1992 Mazda 121
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 121. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 121.
Because 2004 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 121. (105 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden Rodeo | 1992 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Rodeo | 121 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2460 mm |