2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1992 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Toyota 4Runner (112 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Because 1992 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Holden Rodeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Toyota 4Runner. (192 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden Rodeo | 1992 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | Rodeo | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 2366 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2630 mm |
