2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1995 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2004 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden Rodeo | 1995 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Rodeo | MX-3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2460 mm |