2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 1996 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Seat Toledo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Seat Toledo would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1996 Seat Toledo. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1996 Seat Toledo.
Because 2004 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Seat Toledo. (127 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Seat Toledo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden Rodeo | 1996 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Holden | Seat |
| Model | Rodeo | Toledo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2480 mm |
