2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 2000 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (123 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Holden Rodeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Jeep Wrangler. (193 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden Rodeo | 2000 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Rodeo | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 2464 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 193 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2380 mm |
