2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 2000 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Peugeot 607. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Peugeot 607 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot 607 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Peugeot 607 (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 607 should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2004 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 607, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Peugeot 607 (386 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Peugeot 607 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden Rodeo | 2000 Peugeot 607 | |
| Make | Holden | Peugeot |
| Model | Rodeo | 607 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 386 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2710 mm |
