2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Holden Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Holden Rodeo would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Holden Rodeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Compass (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Rodeo. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden Rodeo | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Rodeo | Compass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 2360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2640 mm |
