2004 Holden Rodeo vs. 2010 Proton Arena
To start off, 2010 Proton Arena is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Holden Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Holden Rodeo would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2010 Proton Arena. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2010 Proton Arena.
Because 2004 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Proton Arena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Proton Arena. (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Proton Arena.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden Rodeo | 2010 Proton Arena | |
Make | Holden | Proton |
Model | Rodeo | Arena |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1468 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2610 mm |