2004 Holden UTE vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden UTE | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | UTE | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2540 mm |