2004 Holden UTE vs. 1964 MG MGC
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1964 MG MGC. (149 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1964 MG MGC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden UTE | 1964 MG MGC | |
Make | Holden | MG |
Model | UTE | MGC |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |