2004 Holden UTE vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 600 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden UTE | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | UTE | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2290 mm |
