2004 Holden UTE vs. 1967 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 520 kg more than 1967 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden UTE | 1967 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Holden | Zastava |
Model | UTE | 1500 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2430 mm |