2004 Holden UTE vs. 1975 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 240 kg more than 1975 Nissan 240 C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden UTE | 1975 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | UTE | 240 C |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |