2004 Holden UTE vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 670 kg more than 1978 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden UTE (305 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden UTE | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Holden | Volvo |
| Model | UTE | 66 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
