2004 Holden UTE vs. 1979 Volvo 260

To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 150 kg more than 1979 Volvo 260. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 260. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 260.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Holden UTE 1979 Volvo 260
Make Holden Volvo
Model UTE 260
Year Released 2004 1979
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 2664 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 204 HP 146 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 218 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2660 mm