2004 Holden UTE vs. 1980 Maserati Merak
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1980 Maserati Merak. (157 HP @ 7100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1980 Maserati Merak. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 144 kg more than 1980 Maserati Merak. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden UTE | 1980 Maserati Merak | |
| Make | Holden | Maserati |
| Model | UTE | Merak |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1356 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2610 mm |
