2004 Holden UTE vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden UTE | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | UTE | FTO |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2510 mm |
