2004 Holden UTE vs. 1995 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 4,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E (347 HP) has 143 more horse power than 2004 Holden UTE. (204 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 550 kg more than 2004 Holden UTE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E (480 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden UTE. (305 Nm). This means 1995 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden UTE | 1995 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | UTE | E |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 4973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 347 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 480 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2850 mm |