2004 Holden UTE vs. 1995 Opel Omega

To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1995 Opel Omega. (134 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1995 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 75 kg more than 1995 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Opel Omega. (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Opel Omega.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Holden UTE 1995 Opel Omega
Make Holden Opel
Model UTE Omega
Year Released 2004 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 204 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 185 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1425 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2740 mm