2004 Holden UTE vs. 1997 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Nissan El Grand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Nissan El Grand would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 470 kg more than 2004 Holden UTE.
Because 2004 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden UTE | 1997 Nissan El Grand | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | UTE | El Grand |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |