2004 Holden UTE vs. 1998 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2004 Holden UTE.
Because 2004 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden UTE | 1998 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
Make | Holden | Alfa Romeo |
Model | UTE | 164 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1510 kg |