2004 Holden UTE vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Holden UTE. (204 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 94 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden UTE. (305 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden UTE | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | UTE | Compass |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 319 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2660 mm |