2004 Holden UTE vs. 2005 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2005 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Holden UTE weights approximately 330 kg more than 2005 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2005 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden UTE | 2005 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | UTE | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |