2004 Holden UTE vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz G
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz G is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz G (207 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz G should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden UTE.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz G (540 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden UTE. (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Holden UTE | 2012 Mercedes-Benz G | |
| Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | UTE | G |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 540 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4686 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1824 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2850 mm |
