2004 Holden Vectra vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Holden Vectra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Holden Vectra would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 361 more horse power than 2004 Holden Vectra. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden Vectra.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Holden Vectra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden Vectra. (203 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden Vectra. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 2004 Holden Vectra has manual transmission. 2004 Holden Vectra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Holden Vectra | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Vectra | CLS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 507 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 630 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |