2004 Honda Accord vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda Accord would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Accord (154 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda Accord. (218 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Honda Accord | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Honda | Holden |
Model | Accord | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |